The ‘wisdom of clouds’ heralded as an original way for users to peruse ideas within Internet Evolution's ThinkerNet blogosphere, has a graphical user interface that is embarrassingly bad. In fact it’s so bad, I immediately looked at it on a PC to make sure that I hadn’t missed anything.

It’s not an original idea, and the claim that it allows visitors to take a virtual flight through a cloudbank of ideas is just laughable – which I guess is part of the point of this. ‘Linkbaiting’ says Stowe Boyd.

However, even if that is the case, I wish they’d commissioned a designer to do a bit of work on the interface. Creating a more efficient use of screen space by reducing the navigation box and resizing the posts so that you could get more on the screen at any one time would help enormously.

I read in The Observer this weekend that two of Bollywood’s biggest film stars were racially abused while filming in Southall, west London. The idiocy of such abuse sprang to mind immediately, but not until I’d gotten over the fact that seeing the photograph I’d originally thought the story was about Second Life.

I finally got to see the full length film of Helvetica which has been showing in cinemas and on TV over the last few months. It’s fundamentally a documentary about the typeface Helvetica, which celebrates its 50^th birthday this year, but expands upon this to look at the way type is used in our everyday lives.

The computer now forms a part of everyday life, and most people who use them do not have an understanding of the most basic typographic principles. Films such as Helvetica can help educate the masses, promoting understanding and the case for good design. In fact there’s been very few films or programmes about typography. One that springs to mind is A to Z by Max Whitby, who with Ian Duncan, produced an entertaining documentary for Channel 4’s Signals series around 1987 – when the rest of the world thought typography was something to do with maps.

The Helevtica DVD is released on 20 November and is surely the perfect Christmas present for all those typophiles out there? Or perhaps they would prefer something with serifs?

I thought this was a great post by Rob Waller, Web more visual? I don't think so. Although I've worked in multimedia since 1989 and have been involved in numerous projects combining every kind of media - the fundamental building block of the web is still text. Hence the name of my blog... You may debate the '2'.

When I touched my first iPhone in September I felt happy. It made me smile; it seemed so simple, so obvious. Isn’t this the way all things should be?

We all know that its design is fundamental to its success as a product, but it’s the integration of the hardware and software, the way they work together that really makes the difference.

The screen is large 320 x 480, the interface is clear and simple to use and it feels like a complete product rather than a collection of disparate elements packaged together. So many other devices fail in this most fundamental of areas. It also wins hands down on the simplicity of initialising the handset and the way it integrates with iTunes. All these aspects have been designed to make it an enjoyable experience.

But the key thing to remember is that it’s a new type of device that is already redefining the market, a (usable) computer and phone, so people will use it differently. Friends are using their iPhones in and around the home and office instead of their laptops – the iPhone is making people act in different ways.

From a designers point of view this means that we need to adapt and change our designs, creating interfaces that work in new and appropriate ways. We need to look at different types of devices to appropriate our ideas from as essentially we are creating hardware like interfaces - in software. Yes, something we’ve been doing for years, but now the bar has been raised. With the iPhone there’s more screen real estate to play with and it’s being used in a fundamentally different way. 

The experience and desirability of the iPhone is so strong that people are willing to overlook potential problems: the £269 price tag; a contract with O2 in the UK; the fact that it's a closed device, and still buy them. Between 20,000 to 40,000 were sold in the first weekend according to the Telegraph. There’s definitely a market there, one that’s switched on to good design, but is that market big enough.

But to create such a product you need a visionary (or two) and you need an organisation that is prepared to use design in the way it should be used. This coupled with the fact that technology now allows such a device to be designed for a realistic price tag.

I couldn’t wait for the UK launch. I needed a new phone quickly and so plumped for the next best choice – the Nokia N95 on the 3 network (the only network with unlimited data usage at the time). The camera is good (albeit slow), the GPS great and the way it syncs with my Mac OK (comparatively). When I first started using it though I was disappointed, the interface was disappointing and downright crude in places. It’s good, but it didn’t make me smile.

My husband on the other hand was prepared to wait. I’m jealous. He’s smiling.